Pratama-Kreston Tax Research Center
No Result
View All Result
Tuesday, 18 March 2025
  • Login
  • Consultation
  • Regulation
    • Summary of Regulations
    • Infographics
  • Analysis
    • Articles
    • Opinion
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Journal Articles
  • Our Services
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
    • Fiscal Policy Analysis
    • Local Tax and Retribution Analysis
    • Preparation of Academic Papers
    • Macro Economics Analysis
    • Survey Service
      • Identification of Local Tax & Retribution Object
      • Tax Counseling Effectiveness
      • Community Satisfaction
  • Coverage
    • Tax Webinar
    • Media Coverage
  • Academy
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • ENGLISH
    • INDONESIA
Pratama-Kreston Tax Research Center
  • Consultation
  • Regulation
    • Summary of Regulations
    • Infographics
  • Analysis
    • Articles
    • Opinion
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Journal Articles
  • Our Services
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
    • Fiscal Policy Analysis
    • Local Tax and Retribution Analysis
    • Preparation of Academic Papers
    • Macro Economics Analysis
    • Survey Service
      • Identification of Local Tax & Retribution Object
      • Tax Counseling Effectiveness
      • Community Satisfaction
  • Coverage
    • Tax Webinar
    • Media Coverage
  • Academy
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • ENGLISH
    • INDONESIA
Pratama-Kreston Tax Research Institute
No Result
View All Result
Picture of Muhammad Akbar Aditama

Muhammad Akbar Aditama

Tax Policy Analyst Pratama-Kreston Tax Research Institute

Does your institution require services such as fiscal policy studies, local taxes and retributions, preparation of academic papers, or survey services?

Or, does your business need assistance in preparing an Annual Report or Sustainability Report?

Consult the experts!

START CONSULTATION

PopularNews

  • #image_title

    If the husband has no income, how much is the wife’s PTKP?

    1447 shares
    Share 579 Tweet 362
  • Are public transportation services with yellow plates subject to VAT?

    849 shares
    Share 340 Tweet 212
  • Deadline for Crediting Proof of Income Tax Withholding Article 23

    784 shares
    Share 314 Tweet 196
  • Is the purchase of a website domain subject to Income Tax Article 23?

    693 shares
    Share 277 Tweet 173
  • BPJS contributions are subject to Income Tax Article 21?

    660 shares
    Share 264 Tweet 165

Correction During Audit? What are the Risks and Sanctions of SKPKB?

153
SHARES
1.9k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

QUESTIONS

If the correction is made during the audit, what are the risks or sanctions if the audit results in SKPKB?

  • Togar Sidabutar
Picture of Muhammad Akbar Aditama

Muhammad Akbar Aditama

Tax Policy Analyst Pratama-Kreston Tax Research Institute
DENIAL STATEMENT

All data and information provided in tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id Consultation is general in nature and provided for educational purposes only. As such, the data and information provided cannot be considered as advice from a tax consultant.

Read Disclaimer
DISCLAIMER

Summary Answer:

At the time of audit, the Taxpayer cannot amend the Tax Return as stipulated in Article 8 paragraph (1) of UU KUP, but can disclose the incorrect filling of the Tax Return as stipulated in Article 8 paragraph (4) of UU KUP. At the time of filing the disclosure of untruth, the Taxpayer must pay according to the amount of underpayment in the disclosure tax return plus the interest sanction in Article 8 paragraph (5) and (5a). It should be noted that even though the Taxpayer makes an untruth disclosure, the audit process is still continued. If the audit results in SKPKB, the taxpayer only needs to pay the underpayment amount stated in SKPKB plus interest sanction multiplied by the underpayment amount in SKPKB as stipulated in Article 13 paragraph (1) letter a of UU KUP. For information, the disclosure of untruth does not cause the taxpayer to get additional sanctions at the time of SKPKB issuance.

Complete Discussion:

Thank you Mr Togar for your question. The provision regarding the correction of Tax Return can be referred to Article 8 of Law No. 6 Year 1983 on General Provisions and Tax Procedures until Law No. 6 Year 2023 Stipulating Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 2 Year 2022 on Job Creation into Law (‘KUP Law’).

Taxpayers may correct the submitted Tax Return by submitting a written statement as long as the Director General of Taxes has not conducted audit action as stated in Article 8 paragraph (1) of KUP Law which reads as follows:

‘Taxpayers on their own accord may correct the Tax Return that has been submitted by submitting a written statement provided that the Director General of Taxes has not conducted audit actions.’

Article 8 paragraph (1) of UU KUP

The phrase ‘starting to perform audit actions’ referred to in Article 8 paragraph (1) of UU KUP is when the Tax Auditor submits the Tax Return to the Taxpayer, representative, attorney, employee or adult family member of the Taxpayer.

However, pursuant to Article 8 paragraph (4) of UU KUP, instead, the Taxpayer is still given the opportunity to submit the disclosure of the incorrect filling of the Tax Return that has been submitted in accordance with the actual circumstances, even though the audit process continues. The condition applies when the Director General of Taxes has not submitted the Notice of Audit Result (SPHP), although the audit process is ongoing. Thus, what needs to be noted in this case is that even though the Taxpayer discloses the untruth, the audit process is still continued.

The underpaid tax arising from the disclosure of the incorrect filling of the Tax Return shall be paid by the Taxpayer plus the interest sanction for disclosure. The interest rate as an administrative sanction is determined by the Minister of Finance based on the benchmark interest rate plus 10% and divided by 12 applicable on the date of commencement of the sanction calculation.

This provision refers to Article 8 paragraph (5) and (5a) of UU KUP, which reads as follows:

‘The underpaid tax arising as a result of the disclosure of the incorrect filling of the Tax Return as referred to in paragraph (4) must be paid by the Taxpayer before the separate report is submitted along with administrative sanctions in the form of interest at the interest rate per month determined by the Minister of Finance from the underpaid tax, which is calculated from:

  1. the deadline for submission of Annual Notification Letter ends until the date of payment, for disclosure of untruthful filling of Annual Notification Letter; or
  2. the due date of payment ends until the date of payment for the disclosure of the incorrect filling of the Periodic Tax Return; or and imposed for a maximum of 24 (twenty-four) months, and part of the month shall be counted in full as 1 (one) month’

– Article 8 paragraph (5a) of UU KUP

‘The interest rate per month determined by the Minister of Finance as referred to in paragraph (5) is calculated based on the benchmark interest rate plus 10% (ten per cent) and divided by 12 (twelve) applicable on the date of commencement of the calculation of sanctions’

For information, the disclosure of untruth does not cause the Taxpayer to receive additional sanction upon the issuance of SKPKB. Therefore, if the disclosure of untruth is deemed necessary, the Taxpayer should do it first in accordance with the applicable regulations.

Furthermore, if the taxpayer receives SKPKB as a result of the audit, the taxpayer only needs to pay the amount of underpayment stated in SKPKB plus interest sanction multiplied by the underpayment amount in SKPKB as stipulated in Article 13 paragraph (1) letter a of KUP Law as follows:

‘The Director General of Taxes may issue an Underpaid Tax Assessment Letter within a period of 5 (five) years after the tax becomes payable or the end of the Tax Period, Part of the Tax Year, or Tax Year after an audit action is carried out in the following cases:

    1. there is tax that is not or underpaid;
    2. ………………….

The amount of tax deficiency payable in the Surat Ketetapan Pajak Kurang Bayar as referred to in paragraph (1) letter a shall be added with administrative sanction in the form of interest at the rate of interest per month determined by the Minister of Finance calculated from the time the tax becomes payable or the end of the Tax Period, part of the Tax Year, or Tax Year until the issuance of Surat Ketetapan Pajak Kurang Bayar, and shall be imposed for a maximum of 24 (twenty-four) months and part of the month shall be calculated in full 1 (one) month.

Thus, if in the case of an audit has been conducted, the Taxpayer cannot make the correction. Instead, the Taxpayer may disclose the untruth of the Tax Return by paying the amount of underpayment and sanction incurred. In this case, the disclosure of the untruth does not cause the Taxpayer to get additional sanction at the time of SKPKB issuance. If the SKPKB is issued as a result of the audit, the Taxpayer only needs to pay the underpayment amount stated in the SKPKB plus the interest sanction in accordance with the applicable regulations.

Tags: SKPKBTax Audit
Share61Tweet38Send

DISCLAIMER

Seluruh data dan informasi yang disediakan di dalam Konsultasi pratamainstitute.com bersifat umum dan disediakan untuk tujuan pendidikan saja. Dengan demikian, data dan informasi yang disediakan tidak dapat dianggap sebagai suatu nasihat dari konsultan pajak.

Previous Post

The Importance of Tax SOPs

Next Post

What is Tax Philosophy

Related Posts

#image_title
Consultation

How is the Facility Calculation of Article 31E of CIT Law?

9 months ago
Hibah dari Orang Tua ke Anak Dikenakan Pajak
Consultation

Are grants from parents a tax object? check this out

9 months ago
#image_title
Consultation

How is VAT Imposed on Freight Forwarding Services?

9 months ago
#image_title
Consultation

Can I Correct My Tax Return After The Issuance of SP2DK?

10 months ago
#image_title
Consultation

STP, Can it be paid in installments?

11 months ago
#image_title
Consultation

Is it fine to file an objection or appeal against STP?

11 months ago

BACA JUGA

Ilustrasi Pemeriksaan Pajak

Tips for Dealing with Tax Audit

5 September 2024
Ilustrasi Keberlanjutan

The Importance of ESG Reporting as a Key to Investor Trust

4 September 2024
Ilustrasi pengangguran

Unemployment among the Young Generation

4 September 2024

Understanding and Steps for Facing SP2DK

Gustofan Mahmud: e-Filing Boosts MSME Performance in Indonesia

Pratama Institute Sends Analysts to International Conference at University of Indonesia

Presidential Regulation No. 63/2024 on Tax Treaty

Annual Report as a Means of Exposing Company Value

How is the Facility Calculation of Article 31E of CIT Law?

Are grants from parents a tax object? check this out

Not matching your NIK with your NPWP? This is the Danger

Preventing Tax Revenue Leakages

Could BOPN Increase Tax Ratio?

Is it necessary to establish a State Revenue Authority Agency (BOPN)?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Post
#image_title

What is Tax Philosophy

Copyright © 2025 PT Pratama Indomitra Konsultan

Pratama Institute

Logo Pratama Indomitra
  • Antam Office Tower B Lt 8 Jl. TB Simatupang No. 1 Jakarta Selatan Indonesia 12530
  • Phone : (021) 2963 4945
  • [email protected]
  • pratamaindomitra.co.id

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Consultation
  • Regulation
    • Ringkasan Peraturan
    • Infographic
  • Insight
    • Buletin
  • Analisis
    • Article
    • Opinion
  • Publications
    • Buku
    • Journal
  • Jasa Kami
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report Service
    • Assurance Sustainability Report
    • Fiscal Policy Analysis
    • Local Tax and Retribution Analysis
    • Preparation of Academic Papers
    • Macro Economics Analysis
    • Survey Service
  • Liputan
    • Media Coverage
    • Tax Webinar
  • About Us
    • Contact Us

© 2025 Pratama Institute - All Rights Reserved.

  • Pernyataan Penyangkalan / Disclaimer

Seluruh data dan informasi yang disediakan di dalam Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id bersifat umum dan disediakan untuk tujuan pendidikan saja. Dengan demikian, data dan informasi yang disediakan tidak dapat dianggap sebagai suatu nasihat dari konsultan pajak.

Pada dasarnya Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id tidak menyediakan informasi yang bersifat rahasia dan hubungan klien – konsultan pajak tidak terjadi. Untuk suatu nasihat yang dapat diterapkan pada kasus yang Anda hadapi, Anda dapat menghubungi seorang konsultan pajak yang kompeten.

Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id tidak dapat digugat maupun dituntut atas segala pernyataan, kekeliruan, ketidaktepatan atau kekurangan dalam setiap konten yang disampaikan dalam Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id.

Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id berhak sepenuhnya mengubah judul dan/atau isi pertanyaan tanpa mengubah substansi dari hal-hal yang ditanyakan.

Artikel jawaban tertentu dari Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id mungkin sudah tidak sesuai/tidak relevan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku saat ini.

Kami sarankan Anda untuk mengecek kembali dasar hukum yang digunakan di dalam artikel jawaban Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id untuk memastikan peraturan perundang-undangan yang digunakan masih berlaku.