Pratama-Kreston Tax Research Center
No Result
View All Result
Tuesday, 18 March 2025
  • Login
  • Consultation
  • Regulation
    • Summary of Regulations
    • Infographics
  • Analysis
    • Articles
    • Opinion
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Journal Articles
  • Our Services
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
    • Fiscal Policy Analysis
    • Local Tax and Retribution Analysis
    • Preparation of Academic Papers
    • Macro Economics Analysis
    • Survey Service
      • Identification of Local Tax & Retribution Object
      • Tax Counseling Effectiveness
      • Community Satisfaction
  • Coverage
    • Tax Webinar
    • Media Coverage
  • Academy
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • ENGLISH
    • INDONESIA
Pratama-Kreston Tax Research Center
  • Consultation
  • Regulation
    • Summary of Regulations
    • Infographics
  • Analysis
    • Articles
    • Opinion
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Journal Articles
  • Our Services
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report
    • Fiscal Policy Analysis
    • Local Tax and Retribution Analysis
    • Preparation of Academic Papers
    • Macro Economics Analysis
    • Survey Service
      • Identification of Local Tax & Retribution Object
      • Tax Counseling Effectiveness
      • Community Satisfaction
  • Coverage
    • Tax Webinar
    • Media Coverage
  • Academy
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • ENGLISH
    • INDONESIA
Pratama-Kreston Tax Research Institute
No Result
View All Result

Is it fine to file an objection or appeal against STP?

Muhammad Akbar AditamabyMuhammad Akbar Aditama
29 April 2024
in Consultation
Reading Time: 4 mins read
167 5
A A
0
#image_title

#image_title

197
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Answer Summary:

In accordance with Article 25 of UU KUP, taxpayers cannot file an objection to the STP received because it is not included in an assessment letter that can be objected to. The alternative solution is that the taxpayer can submit a request for STP cancellation, if the taxpayer considers that the STP issuance is “incorrect” in accordance with Article 36 paragraph (1) of UU KUP. Furthermore, if the Director General of Taxes rejects the STP cancellation request, taxpayers can file a lawsuit to the Tax Court in accordance with Article 23 of the KUP Law.

Complete Discussion:

Thank you, Mr. Nur, for your question. Based on the question given, several points in the STP are approved and ask about whether or not you can file an objection or appeal against the issuance of the STP. Provisions regarding STP, objections, and appeals are regulated in the KUP Law. Therefore, we will answer your question in accordance with the provisions in the KUP Law.

Based on Article 25, paragraph (1) of KUP Law, the taxpayer does not file an objection to the STP received because it is not included in an assessment letter that can be objected to. The explanation of the provisions regarding the submission of objections is regulated as follows:

(1) Taxpayers may file an objection only to the Director General of Taxes on an: ***)

1. Surat Ketetapan Pajak Kurang Bayar;
2. Additional underpaid tax assessment letter;
3. Nil tax assessment letter;
4. Tax Assessment Letter of Overpayment or
5. tax withholding or collection by a third party based on the provisions of tax laws and regulations.
– Article 25, paragraph (1) of UU KUP

In accordance with the explanation of Article 25 paragraph (1) of UU KUP, taxpayers may file an objection if they assess the amount of loss, the amount of tax, and tax withholding or collection is not appropriate.

Furthermore, the taxpayer’s objection is to the material or content of a tax assessment. Meanwhile, STP is a letter issued by the Director General of Taxes to collect tax debts that are underpaid or not paid by taxpayers. An appeal can only be submitted based on an Objection Decree.

These provisions are regulated in Article 27, paragraph (1) as follows:
(1) Taxpayers can submit an appeal only to the tax judiciary regarding the Objection Decree as intended in Article 26 paragraph (1).
– Article 27 paragraph (1) of the KUP Law.

Therefore, Taxpayers cannot submit objections and/or appeals to the STP due to differences in the substance regulated in the STP and the Assessment Letter. However, as an alternative solution, taxpayers can apply for cancellation of the STP that the Director General of Taxes has received.

Note that the Taxpayer feels that the STP issued is “not correct” and can provide evidence that there was inaccuracy by the tax officer in issuing the STP. Provisions regarding cancellation of STP are regulated in Article 36 paragraph (1) of the KUP Law, as follows:
(1) The Director General of Taxes, by virtue of his position or at the request of the Taxpayer, may: ***)

1. reduce or eliminate administrative sanctions in the form of interest, fines and increases owed in accordance with the provisions of tax laws and regulations in the event that the sanctions are imposed due to the Taxpayer’s negligence or not due to his/her fault;
2. reduce or cancel incorrect tax assessments
3. reduce or cancel the incorrect Tax Collection Letter as intended in Article 14; or
4. cancel the results of a tax audit or a tax assessment letter based on the results of an audit carried out without: 1. submitting a letter of notification of the audit results or 2. final discussion of audit results with the Taxpayer.
– Article 36 paragraph (1) of the KUP Law

In accordance with the explanation of Article 36 paragraph (1) of the KUP Law, the Director General of Taxes, in his capacity or at the request of the Taxpayer, can cancel the STP that has been issued if there is inaccuracy by the tax officer. Taxpayers can submit a request for STP cancellation to the Director General of Taxes.

Provisions regarding the application are regulated in Article 3 paragraph (1) PMK-8/2013.
(1) The Taxpayer’s application as intended in Article 2, is made by submitting a letter of application to the Tax Service Office where the Taxpayer is registered and/or where the Taxable Entrepreneur is confirmed, which can be done:
1. directly;
2. by post with proof of delivery of the letter or
3. in another way.
– Article 3 paragraph (1) PMK-8/2013

Taxpayers need to pay attention to the requirements that need to be met to submit a request for STP cancellation, which are further regulated in Article 18 paragraph (5) PMK-8/2013, as follows:
(5) Application for reduction or cancellation of the Tax Collection Letter as intended in paragraph (1), must fulfill the following requirements:

1. 1 (one) application for 1 (one) Tax Collection Letter;
2. the application must be submitted in writing in Indonesian;
3. state the amount of the tax bill and/or administrative sanctions in the Tax Collection Letter according to the Taxpayer, accompanied by reasons;
4. the application must be submitted to the Tax Service Office where the Taxpayer is registered, And
5. The application letter is signed by the Taxpayer. If a non-taxpayer signs the application letter, it must be accompanied by a special power of attorney, as intended in Article 32 paragraph (3) of the KUP Law.
– Article 18 paragraph (5) PMK-8/2013

The Director General of Taxes will provide an answer to the cancellation request by 6 (six) months from the date the cancellation request is received. Furthermore, suppose the Director General of Taxes does not grant the request for canceling the STP. In that case, the Director General of Taxes is obliged to provide written information regarding the matters that are the basis for rejecting the request for canceling the STP.

The final alternative that taxpayers can take is to file a lawsuit regarding the rejected STP cancellation request to the Tax Court. In accordance with Article 23 of the KUP Law, Taxpayers can file a lawsuit against decisions relating to the implementation of tax decisions, in addition to requests for objections and appeals.

Thus, Mr. Nur cannot submit objections and/or appeals to the issuance of the STP even though several points are not approved in it. As an alternative solution, Mr. Nur can apply to cancel the STP if the value is incorrect.

Furthermore, if the STP cancellation application is not accepted, then Mr Nur can file a lawsuit in accordance with Article 23 of the KUP Law. Hopefully, our answer can help.

Tags: appealKUP LAWlawsuitobjectTax bill
Share79Tweet49Send
Previous Post

Corporate Tax Return Report Not Ready, Here’s How to Extend it

Next Post

Tax Aspects of Operating Profit and Capital Gain

Muhammad Akbar Aditama

Muhammad Akbar Aditama

Tax Policy Analyst Pratama-Kreston Tax Research Institute

Related Posts

#image_title
Consultation

How is the Facility Calculation of Article 31E of CIT Law?

26 June 2024
Hibah dari Orang Tua ke Anak Dikenakan Pajak
Consultation

Are grants from parents a tax object? check this out

25 June 2024
#image_title
Consultation

How is VAT Imposed on Freight Forwarding Services?

11 June 2024
#image_title
Consultation

Can I Correct My Tax Return After The Issuance of SP2DK?

3 June 2024
#image_title
Consultation

STP, Can it be paid in installments?

7 May 2024
#image_title
Consultation

Is VAT on Car Rental for Director Creditable?

25 April 2024
Next Post
#image_title

Tax Aspects of Operating Profit and Capital Gain

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Does your institution require services such as fiscal policy studies, local taxes and retributions, preparation of academic papers, or survey services?

Or, does your business need assistance in preparing an Annual Report or Sustainability Report?

Consult the experts!

START CONSULTATION

PopularNews

  • #image_title

    If the husband has no income, how much is the wife’s PTKP?

    1447 shares
    Share 579 Tweet 362
  • Are public transportation services with yellow plates subject to VAT?

    849 shares
    Share 340 Tweet 212
  • Deadline for Crediting Proof of Income Tax Withholding Article 23

    784 shares
    Share 314 Tweet 196
  • Is the purchase of a website domain subject to Income Tax Article 23?

    693 shares
    Share 277 Tweet 173
  • BPJS contributions are subject to Income Tax Article 21?

    660 shares
    Share 264 Tweet 165
Copyright © 2025 PT Pratama Indomitra Konsultan

Pratama Institute

Logo Pratama Indomitra
  • Antam Office Tower B Lt 8 Jl. TB Simatupang No. 1 Jakarta Selatan Indonesia 12530
  • Phone : (021) 2963 4945
  • [email protected]
  • pratamaindomitra.co.id

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Consultation
  • Regulation
    • Ringkasan Peraturan
    • Infographic
  • Insight
    • Buletin
  • Analisis
    • Article
    • Opinion
  • Publications
    • Buku
    • Journal
  • Jasa Kami
    • Annual Report
    • Sustainability Report Service
    • Assurance Sustainability Report
    • Fiscal Policy Analysis
    • Local Tax and Retribution Analysis
    • Preparation of Academic Papers
    • Macro Economics Analysis
    • Survey Service
  • Liputan
    • Media Coverage
    • Tax Webinar
  • About Us
    • Contact Us

© 2025 Pratama Institute - All Rights Reserved.

  • Pernyataan Penyangkalan / Disclaimer

Seluruh data dan informasi yang disediakan di dalam Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id bersifat umum dan disediakan untuk tujuan pendidikan saja. Dengan demikian, data dan informasi yang disediakan tidak dapat dianggap sebagai suatu nasihat dari konsultan pajak.

Pada dasarnya Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id tidak menyediakan informasi yang bersifat rahasia dan hubungan klien – konsultan pajak tidak terjadi. Untuk suatu nasihat yang dapat diterapkan pada kasus yang Anda hadapi, Anda dapat menghubungi seorang konsultan pajak yang kompeten.

Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id tidak dapat digugat maupun dituntut atas segala pernyataan, kekeliruan, ketidaktepatan atau kekurangan dalam setiap konten yang disampaikan dalam Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id.

Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id berhak sepenuhnya mengubah judul dan/atau isi pertanyaan tanpa mengubah substansi dari hal-hal yang ditanyakan.

Artikel jawaban tertentu dari Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id mungkin sudah tidak sesuai/tidak relevan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku saat ini.

Kami sarankan Anda untuk mengecek kembali dasar hukum yang digunakan di dalam artikel jawaban Konsultasi tri.pratamaindomitra.co.id untuk memastikan peraturan perundang-undangan yang digunakan masih berlaku.